your socialist home on the internet
ABOUT US
who we are, what we do
NEWS & VIEWS newspaper, articles, statements
THEORY what is socialism, marxism
JOIN US! joining, getting active
CONTACT US branch directory
Y.S.A. youth 4 socialist action
F.I. socialists around the world
CULTURE poetry, reviews, commentary
HISTORY events & people from the past
SCIENCE science, dialectics & more
LINKS other important sites
WHAT'S NEW listing of what's been recently added
|
| revolutionary socialists in the United States |
Palestinian resistance groups ripped by internal conflicts
by Gerry Foley
While the Israeli army continues to decimate the leaderships of the
Palestinian resistance organizations and terrorize the Palestinian
territories, the Palestinian Authority has been gripped by an acute
crisis
involving clashes among armed factions.
On July 31, the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a movement linked to Yasir
Arafat’s
Al Fatah, burned down the building in the West Bank city of Jenin
housing
the intelligence service of the Palestinian Authority, of which Arafat
is
president.
The following day, 20 members of a small grouping within Al Fatah
dispersed
with gunfire a meeting of Palestinian legislators and senior Al Fatah
officials being held in the West Bank city of Nablus to discuss reform
of
the Palestinian authority. The armed members of the Al Awda Brigades
claimed, according to the Al Jazeera web site, that the meeting was
really
aimed against Yasir Arafat.
A U.S. wire service reported with respect to the Jenin incident:
“Zakaria
Zubeida, a local leader of the group Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade, told CNN
the
militants burned down the buildings because members of the intelligence
services had been following them and they feared their whereabouts
would be
passed on to the Israeli military.”
The assault on the Palestinian intelligence services building in Jenin
was
followed by a demonstration of 5000 people in the streets of the city
supporting the attackers, an Al Jazeera dispatch of Aug. 1 reported.
An analysis of the conflict in the Aug. 1 issue of the Paris daily Le
Monde
claimed that the dispute had had only a “limited” effect on the
Palestinian
population because it was seen as a faction fight within Al Fatah. But
the
Jenin demonstration seems to indicate that the strife is beginning to
have a
wider response.
The “reformers” also seem to be upping the ante. In its Aug. 1 issue,
the
liberal Zionist daily Haaretz reported an inflammatory statement by
Mohammed
Dahlan, Arafat’s erstwhile security chief and now rival: “‘Arafat is
sitting
on the corpses and destruction of the Palestinians at a time when
they’re
desperately in need of a new mentality,’ Dahlan was quoted as saying
during
the interview, which was held in Jordan.
“If Arafat does not carry out real reforms within the PA by August 10,
30,000 Palestinians will demonstrate in the streets of Gaza, Dahlan
said.”
The conflict between the Palestinian Authority and the Al Aqsa Martyrs
Brigade opened up wide in the middle of July when Arafat tried to
consolidate the Palestinian security services under the authority of
his
nephew Musa Arafat. The appointment was followed by protests by armed
groups, as well as the resignation of the Palestinian Authority premier
Ahmed Qureia, which Arafat refused to accept.
The confrontation between Arafat and Qureia was resolved at least
temporarily by Arafat agreeing to share control of security with
Qureia. But
a tug-of-war came out in the open. Next, the Palestine legislature
produced
a report denouncing the Qureia government as a failure.
There have been various interpretations of the conflict in the local
and
international press, with some calling it a dispute between Arafat’s
“Old
Guard” and the rising generation in Fatah while others blame it on
Dahlan.
But it is clear that Arafat’s authority is at the center of it.
In fact, Arafat’s strength is also his weakness. He is a bonapartist
figure
who is able to bridge the gap between the fighters and the opportunist
politicians in a way that no other personality can. But the
contradictions
of his role are wearing his regime out.
The United States and Israel are trying to find a Palestinian
politician who
can collaborate with the Zionist authorities to suppress the
Palestinian
resistance. Arafat’s former premier, Abu Mazen, broke his back trying
to fit
into that role without touching off a Palestinian civil war that he
knew he
would lose. Dahlan was associated with Abu Mazen and has won a
reputation
with the Israelis and the U.S. as a “realist.”
The British business magazine The Economist noted July 22: “Young,
well-dressed and energetic, a fluent Hebrew speaker from his time in
Israeli
prisons, Mr. Dahlan is a wily operator. The Israelis savour his
apparent
enmity to Mr. Arafat. The younger man is readier to say things that
Israelis
like to hear—for instance, acknowledging that they will never accept
the
return of Palestinian refugees to their original homes, since the
demographic change that would ensue would lead to the end of a Jewish
state.”
If, as the Israeli daily Yediot Ahoronot claims, the Islamic militant
organization Hamas has decided to support Arafat in the present
conflict, it
is probably because it fears the rise of Dahlan. But the shifting
alliances
among the armed factions are less and less able to contain the
contradictions in the Palestinian leadership.
In its July 18 analysis of the crisis, Al Jazeera quoted “civil society
activist” Mustapha Barghuti at length. He argued that the solution to
the
conflict was to create a normal parliamentary structure in the
Palestinian
areas, new municipal elections (none have been held since 1976), an
“independent judiciary,” and so on.
But in a society under the sort of pressures that the Palestinian areas
are,
there is no way that a “normal” parliamentary system can work. The gap
between the fighters and the relatively privileged and bureaucratic
elements
of Palestinian society is too wide and growing. The impoverishment of
the
masses and the pressure that they face from the Israeli forces are too
great.
The constant attacks by the Israeli army have prevented the Palestinian
Authority from functioning almost entirely on the West Bank and gravely
disrupted its functioning in the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian
administration
is essentially financed by grants from the European Union, which are
only
able to keep a bureaucracy in waiting (125,000 functionaries for a
population of 3.5 million).
Dahlan complains that the PA has spent $5 billion of the European
Union’s
money without the Palestinian people seeing any result. Of course, the
reason the EU provides this money is to build up the basis for a
Palestinian
mini-state that can sell out the Palestinians to Israel. In a society
where
more than 60 percent of the economically active population is
unemployed,
these bureaucratic posts can be a major factor of corruption.
The prospect of a sell-out are in fact increased by the present faction
fight and the process of the Palestinian people being worn out by the
pressures it is under and the demoralization caused by the failures of
its
leadership.
The demoralization of the Palestinian people is clearly what the
Zionists
are waiting for. Al Jazeera reported July 5 with respect to a debate in
the
Israeli parliament, the Knesset: “[Israeli chief of staff Moshe] A’alon
scolded the committee [on defense and foreign affairs] for revealing
that
the Israeli occupation army effectively provoked the Palestinians into
escalating the violence during the first few months of the second
intifada
in order to give the army a pretext to hit hard on the Palestinian
society
and bully it into unconditional surrender.”
The report went on to say: “According to Israeli sources, then Chief of
Staff and now Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz didn’t plan to bring about
the
end of the conflict.
“Instead, he thought he had finally seized the opportunity to ‘beat and
vanquish’ the Palestinians in order to ‘burn into their consciousness’
and
make them ‘internalize their weakness and inferiority vis-a-vis
Israel’s
strength.’
“Mofaz’s ultimate aim, of which he later convinced Israeli Prime
Minister
Ariel Sharon, was to hector Palestinians into negotiations in a
weakened and
exhausted state whereby they would have no choice but to accept
Israel’s
dictates and demands.”
The Palestinian resistance has likely exceeded the determination the
Zionists expected from it. But it is showing erosion. The present
conflict
indicates the dangers. In order to overcome the divisions, the
Palestinian
fighters need a social revolution in the territories they dominate, the
creation of a central authority based in local organs elected by the
masses
and loyal to them, dedicated to the victory of their struggle.
They need an organization that can raise the perspective of a social
revolution in the Middle East and mobilize the great majority of
working
people in the region to fight the imperialists and their local agents.
The article above first appeared in the August 2004 issue of Socialist Action newspaper.
Socialist Action: 298 Valencia St., San Francisco CA 94103 (415) 255-1080 -- socialistact@igc.org |
Youth 4 Socialist Action: P.O. Box 16853, Duluth MN 55816 (715) 394-6660 -- mnsocialist@yahoo.com |
|